Offsite manufacturing and standardised design
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
The UK construction industry is facing two key issues: a skills shortage and an increasing demand for improved infrastructure.
The 2016 government-commissioned Farmer review identified that the number of skilled workers in the industry is likely to decline by at least 20% over the next decade.
Offsite construction using standardised factory-made components has the potential to reduce the current risks to future infrastructure delivery. As seen in the housing sector it offers shorter programmes and reduced costs coupled with higher outputs and more consistent quality. The reduction of head-count on site also improves health and safety.
But though offsite is well suited to large housing schemes the often linear nature of infrastructure projects and programmes and their greater geographical spread are perceived as barriers to offsite delivery.
[edit] Need for standard designs
Traditionally bridges, retaining walls and other transport infrastructure assets are designed on a bespoke, site-specific basis. As a result, there is a lack of repetition.
Motorway gantries are a good example of where standardisation has been possible allowing the benefits of offsite fabrication to be realised. Standard design families have been created that are adjustable for specific locations but allow automated design and manufacturing processes, which in turn improves buildability and reduces cost.
Similar processes could be used for road and rail bridge construction – but there is added complexity due to greater variation in loading, geometry and aesthetic influences. Geotechnical interactions can also be diverse, particularly where integral construction leads to complex soil-structure interaction.
To realise the benefits of offsite for infrastructure, a compromise is needed from what might traditionally have been considered an ‘optimised design’. Small concessions made in designing bridges to standard skews, or to modules of fixed span length, will most likely be offset by productivity benefits. It would allow the use of standardised components (including multiple-use of expensive precast moulds), that lend themselves to automated digital engineering, manufacturing and traceability.
[edit] Attractive working environments
Offsite also enables many construction activities to be moved into climate-controlled, dry factories that are safe and pleasant places to work in compared to remote, weather-exposed site locations. In time this could lead to a growing number of construction workers, with the industry once again becoming attractive.
There is also great potential to minimise exposure of the workforce to road and rail traffic and associated safety hazards. Issues such as lifting heavy manufactured units and temporarily stabilising them during assembly need to be carefully addressed, but familiarisation and practice will bring its own safety benefits.
As well as greater education on how the industry can further utilise offsite construction, close collaboration in the design process between clients, designers, contractors and manufacturers is also important.
With a move towards increased early contractor involvement as a form of procurement, and the opportunities currently presented by the major infrastructure projects in the UK, the civil engineering industry is now at a point where it can and must seize the opportunity to change and modernise. This means adopting standardised offsite construction.
This article was originally published here on 24 Jan 2018 by ICE. It was written by John Armitage, Ramboll.
--The Institution of Civil Engineers
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Articles by ICE on Designing Buildings Wiki.
- Building Skills for Offsite Construction.
- Design for Manufacture and Assembly (DfMA).
- How to make projects off-site ready.
- Modular buildings.
- Off-site construction.
- Off site, on track.
- Off-site prefabrication of buildings: A guide to connection choices.
- Offsite manufacturing.
- Platform approach to design for manufacture and assembly.
- Prefabrication.
Featured articles and news
The 5 elements of seiri, seiton, seiso, seiketsu and shitsuke.
Shading for housing, a design guide
A look back at embedding a new culture of shading.
The Architectural Technology Awards
The AT Awards 2025 are open for entries!
ECA Blueprint for Electrification
The 'mosaic of interconnected challenges' and how to deliver the UK’s Transition to Clean Power.
Grenfell Tower Principal Contractor Award notice
Tower repair and maintenance contractor announced as demolition contractor.
Passivhaus social homes benefit from heat pump service
Sixteen new homes designed and built to achieve Passivhaus constructed in Dumfries & Galloway.
CABE Publishes Results of 2025 Building Control Survey
Concern over lack of understanding of how roles have changed since the introduction of the BSA 2022.
British Architectural Sculpture 1851-1951
A rich heritage of decorative and figurative sculpture. Book review.
A programme to tackle the lack of diversity.
Independent Building Control review panel
Five members of the newly established, Grenfell Tower Inquiry recommended, panel appointed.
Welsh Recharging Electrical Skills Charter progresses
ECA progressing on the ‘asks’ of the Recharging Electrical Skills Charter at the Senedd in Wales.
A brief history from 1890s to 2020s.
CIOB and CORBON combine forces
To elevate professional standards in Nigeria’s construction industry.
Amendment to the GB Energy Bill welcomed by ECA
Move prevents nationally-owned energy company from investing in solar panels produced by modern slavery.
Gregor Harvie argues that AI is state-sanctioned theft of IP.
Experimental AI housing target help for councils
Experimental AI could help councils meet housing targets by digitising records.
BSRIA Occupant Wellbeing survey BOW
Occupant satisfaction and wellbeing tool inc. physical environment, indoor facilities, functionality and accessibility.