Offsite manufacturing and standardised design
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
The UK construction industry is facing two key issues: a skills shortage and an increasing demand for improved infrastructure.
The 2016 government-commissioned Farmer review identified that the number of skilled workers in the industry is likely to decline by at least 20% over the next decade.
Offsite construction using standardised factory-made components has the potential to reduce the current risks to future infrastructure delivery. As seen in the housing sector it offers shorter programmes and reduced costs coupled with higher outputs and more consistent quality. The reduction of head-count on site also improves health and safety.
But though offsite is well suited to large housing schemes the often linear nature of infrastructure projects and programmes and their greater geographical spread are perceived as barriers to offsite delivery.
[edit] Need for standard designs
Traditionally bridges, retaining walls and other transport infrastructure assets are designed on a bespoke, site-specific basis. As a result, there is a lack of repetition.
Motorway gantries are a good example of where standardisation has been possible allowing the benefits of offsite fabrication to be realised. Standard design families have been created that are adjustable for specific locations but allow automated design and manufacturing processes, which in turn improves buildability and reduces cost.
Similar processes could be used for road and rail bridge construction – but there is added complexity due to greater variation in loading, geometry and aesthetic influences. Geotechnical interactions can also be diverse, particularly where integral construction leads to complex soil-structure interaction.
To realise the benefits of offsite for infrastructure, a compromise is needed from what might traditionally have been considered an ‘optimised design’. Small concessions made in designing bridges to standard skews, or to modules of fixed span length, will most likely be offset by productivity benefits. It would allow the use of standardised components (including multiple-use of expensive precast moulds), that lend themselves to automated digital engineering, manufacturing and traceability.
[edit] Attractive working environments
Offsite also enables many construction activities to be moved into climate-controlled, dry factories that are safe and pleasant places to work in compared to remote, weather-exposed site locations. In time this could lead to a growing number of construction workers, with the industry once again becoming attractive.
There is also great potential to minimise exposure of the workforce to road and rail traffic and associated safety hazards. Issues such as lifting heavy manufactured units and temporarily stabilising them during assembly need to be carefully addressed, but familiarisation and practice will bring its own safety benefits.
As well as greater education on how the industry can further utilise offsite construction, close collaboration in the design process between clients, designers, contractors and manufacturers is also important.
With a move towards increased early contractor involvement as a form of procurement, and the opportunities currently presented by the major infrastructure projects in the UK, the civil engineering industry is now at a point where it can and must seize the opportunity to change and modernise. This means adopting standardised offsite construction.
This article was originally published here on 24 Jan 2018 by ICE. It was written by John Armitage, Ramboll.
--The Institution of Civil Engineers
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Articles by ICE on Designing Buildings Wiki.
- Building Skills for Offsite Construction.
- Design for Manufacture and Assembly (DfMA).
- How to make projects off-site ready.
- Modular buildings.
- Off-site construction.
- Off site, on track.
- Off-site prefabrication of buildings: A guide to connection choices.
- Offsite manufacturing.
- Platform approach to design for manufacture and assembly.
- Prefabrication.
Featured articles and news
Exchange for Change for UK deposit return scheme
The UK Deposit Management Organisation established to deliver Deposit Return Scheme unveils trading name.
A guide to integrating heat pumps
As the Future Homes Standard approaches Future Homes Hub publishes hints and tips for Architects and Architectural Technologists.
BSR as a standalone body; statements, key roles, context
Statements from key figures in key and changing roles.
ECA launches Welsh Election Manifesto
ECA calls on political parties 100 day milestone to the Senedd elections.
Resident engagement as the key to successful retrofits
Retrofit is about people, not just buildings, from early starts to beyond handover.
Plastic, recycling and its symbol
Student competition winning, M.C.Esher inspired Möbius strip design symbolising continuity within a finite entity.
Do you take the lead in a circular construction economy?
Help us develop and expand this wiki as a resource for academia and industry alike.
Warm Homes Plan Workforce Taskforce
Risks of undermining UK’s energy transition due to lack of electrotechnical industry representation, says ECA.
Cost Optimal Domestic Electrification CODE
Modelling retrofits only on costs that directly impact the consumer: upfront cost of equipment, energy costs and maintenance costs.
The Warm Homes Plan details released
What's new and what is not, with industry reactions.
Could AI and VR cause an increase the value of heritage?
The Orange book: 2026 Amendment 4 to BS 7671:2018
ECA welcomes IET and BSI content sign off.
How neural technologies could transform the design future
Enhancing legacy parametric engines, offering novel ways to explore solutions and generate geometry.
Key AI related terms to be aware of
With explanations from the UK government and other bodies.
From QS to further education teacher
Applying real world skills with the next generation.





















